Study: UK Universities Face Financial Risks from Proposed Immigration Reforms

Background on UK Higher Education and Immigration Policy

The UK’s higher education sector has long been a cornerstone of its global reputation, attracting international students who contribute significantly to both academic institutions and the national economy. However, recent data and policy developments signal potential challenges. According to a March 2025 report, foreign student enrollment in UK universities declined in the 2023/24 academic year, driven partly by stricter immigration policies and global competition (ICEF Monitor, March 2025). This decline follows a period of substantial growth, with international students doubling their share of total enrollment from 12% in 2001/02 to 24% by 2021/22, largely due to surging postgraduate numbers.

In April 2025, a UK commission emphasized the need for a more strategic and sustainable approach to international student recruitment, highlighting the sector’s reliance on foreign tuition fees, which accounted for nearly 20% of university income in 2023/24 (ICEF Monitor, April 2025). The commission warned that without a balanced strategy, universities risk financial instability. Adding to these concerns, the UK government’s immigration white paper, detailed in May 2025, outlined plans to reduce migration across all visa categories, including the Student Route, and shorten the Graduate Route work term from two years to 18 months (ICEF Monitor, May 2025). These reforms could further deter international students, exacerbating financial pressures on universities.

A new analysis from the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change underscores the vulnerability of UK universities, particularly Post-1992 institutions, to these proposed immigration changes. This article explores the potential impacts, focusing on the financial and regional consequences for the higher education sector.

The Rise and Role of Post-1992 Universities

Origins and Characteristics

Post-1992 universities, often called “modern” or “new” universities, emerged from the Further and Higher Education Act 1992, which granted university status to 78 former polytechnics and colleges. These institutions now constitute nearly half of the UK’s higher education system. Designed to expand access to higher education in underserved regions, Post-92 universities emphasize applied programs, aligning their offerings with local labor market needs and prioritizing graduate employability. Their agile structures enable flexible program delivery, attracting a diverse student base, including non-traditional learners. Post-1992 universities popular among international students include Anglia Ruskin University, Coventry University, University of Greenwich, London Met., and Nottingham Trent University.

Economic and Social Contributions

These universities play a vital role in their communities, serving as major employers and economic drivers in often economically deprived areas. By offering accessible degree programs, they enhance regional opportunities and foster social mobility. Their focus on practical, career-oriented education strengthens local workforces, making them integral to regional development.

Financial Vulnerabilities in the Higher Education Sector

Dependence on International Student Fees

The financial health of many UK universities hinges on international student tuition fees, which have grown dramatically from £4.7 billion in 2016/17 to £10 billion in 2023/24. This revenue stream is particularly critical for Post-1992 universities, which rely more heavily on international students compared to top-tier Russell Group institutions, known for generating larger budget surpluses. The Tony Blair Institute projects that 43% of UK universities will face deficits in the 2024/25 academic year, with 72% potentially in deficit by 2025/26, and 40% at risk of having fewer than 30 days’ liquidity.

Impact of Proposed Immigration Reforms

The government’s immigration white paper aims to reduce net migration, including through restrictions on the Student Route. These changes are expected to decrease international student numbers, directly threatening university budgets. Post-1992 universities, with their greater dependence on foreign tuition fees, face heightened risks. A sudden drop in enrollment could jeopardize their financial stability, potentially leading to reduced course offerings, staff layoffs, or even institutional closures.

Balancing Immigration Goals with Higher Education Needs

Policy Trade-Offs

The Tony Blair Institute highlights the tension between the government’s dual objectives: curbing immigration and supporting economic growth through higher education. While reducing migration aligns with current policy priorities, it risks undermining the economic and social contributions of universities, particularly in less affluent regions. The report urges policymakers to consider these trade-offs carefully, advocating for measures to mitigate the financial impact on vulnerable institutions.

Recommendations for Sustainability

To address these challenges, the report suggests a balanced approach to immigration reform that preserves the international appeal of UK universities. This could include targeted exemptions for high-demand programs or regions heavily reliant on university-driven economic activity. Additionally, diversifying revenue streams and reducing dependence on international fees could bolster the sector’s resilience, ensuring that Post-1992 universities continue to serve their communities effectively.

The final Word

The UK’s higher education sector stands at a crossroads as proposed immigration reforms threaten to disrupt a critical revenue source. Post-1992 universities, with their significant regional impact and reliance on international student fees, are particularly exposed. As the government navigates its immigration agenda, it must weigh the economic and social value of these institutions to avoid unintended consequences that could undermine access to education and regional prosperity.

 

US State Department: “Resume Student Visas but vet students with ‘hostile attitudes’”

The United States Department of State has said that it will resume student visa applications but has asked all applicants to make their social media accounts public. Instructions to officials include identifying “any indications of hostility toward the citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles of the United States”. These guidelines apply to all F, M and J visa applicants and applicants to these categories will be impacted. 

In addition, any applicant who keeps their social media private will be adjudged to have been trying to hide their social media activity- a likely cause for rejection of visa applications in the future. 

“It is an expectation from American citizens that their government will make every effort to make our country safer, and that is exactly what the Trump Administration is doing every single day,” a senior State Department official added.

Visa officers have been instructed to look for applicants “who advocate for, aid, or support designated foreign terrorists and other threats to national security; or who perpetrate unlawful anti-Semitic harassment or violence“. 

Instructions sent to Diplomatic posts worldwide

A cable obtained by CNN on Wednesday reveals that new instructions were dispatched to U.S. diplomatic posts globally. The guidance mandates that the vetting process for student and exchange visa applicants will now examine their “entire online presence.” As part of this updated procedure, applicants must make their social media profiles public. The cable also indicates that “limited access to, or visibility of, online presence could be construed as an effort to evade or hide certain activity.” Embassies and consulates worldwide have been given a deadline of 5 days to implement the new guidelines. 

 

How easy will the new guidelines be to implement? 

Implementing the new U.S. guidelines for screening F, M, and J visa applicants’ social media will be challenging. The vague criteria for “hostility” lack clear definitions, risking inconsistent interpretations by consular officers. Reviewing entire online presences, including taking screenshots, will strain resources, increase workloads, and likely cause delays. The requirement to set profiles to public may also raise privacy concerns, complicating compliance.

 

How will this impact new applicants?

The new U.S. guidelines will significantly impact applicants worldwide. The vague criteria may lead to inconsistent rejections, causing confusion and delays. Applicants must set profiles to public, raising privacy concerns and potentially exposing them to scrutiny over old or misinterpreted posts. The resource-intensive process could overwhelm consulates, slowing visa approvals and disrupting academic plans, especially for students targeting U.S. universities.

 

What is the future going to be like for the US as a destination for international students?

Interest in studying in the U.S. has been declining, particularly among international students, as evidenced by multiple sources:

SEVIS Data Decline:

Between March 2024 and March 2025, international student enrolment in the U.S. dropped by 11.33%, with a significant 28% reduction in Indian students, a key demographic. This decline, noted in SEVIS data, reflects a $4 billion revenue loss for U.S. higher education. 

Studyportals Data:

Student interest in U.S. programs fell to its lowest level since the COVID-19 pandemic, with a 50% drop in weekly pageviews for U.S. degrees between January and April 2025. Students are increasingly exploring alternatives in the UK, Australia, and other countries.

Keystone Education Group Survey:

A 2024 survey showed a 42% drop in international student interest in U.S. Master’s and PhD programs post-Trump’s re-election, citing stricter immigration policies and safety concerns. 

Common App Data:

International student applications to U.S. colleges declined by 1% in 2025, marking the first time since 2019 that domestic applicant growth outpaced international growth.

Are the days of the USA as #1 destination for international students numbered? 

With the UK, France, Ireland and Germany seeing a surge in the number of student visa applications, it does seem that the USA is seeing its grip on the first spot in international education loosen. The attacks on Columbia and Harvard, along with the rhetoric directed at international students who participated in anti-war protests has resulted in thousands of students either putting the decision to study in the US on hold or abandoning plans to study in the US altogether. Although new developments in Iran have put the attacks on higher education in the shadows, the USA is in very real danger of losing the top spot in international enrolments. 

New Scholarship in UK to Shape Future AI Leaders

A groundbreaking scholarship in UK, launching in spring 2026, aims to nurture the next wave of artificial intelligence (AI) innovators. Named the Sparck AI Scholarships, this initiative honours Karen Sparck Jones, a trailblazing British computer scientist. It offers master’s degree students a chance to study in UK and work with top AI companies.

What Are the Sparck AI Scholarships?

The Sparck AI Scholarships are a fully-funded program by the UK government. They cover tuition fees and living expenses for master’s students, making it easier to study in UK without financial stress. The program is part of the government’s ‘AI Opportunities Action Plan,‘ backed by over £17 million in funding from Westminster.

This scholarship in UK targets students passionate about AI. It will be offered at nine leading universities, including Bristol, Newcastle, Manchester, and Edinburgh.

Why the University of Bristol Stands Out

The University of Bristol is thrilled to join this initiative. “We relish the opportunity,” the university stated, excited to support students in exploring AI’s potential. In 2024, Bristol earned the title of ‘AI University of the Year‘ and developed Isambard-AI, the UK’s most powerful supercomputer for AI research.

Bristol’s Vice-Chancellor, Evelyn Welch, said the scholarships would allow the university to “explore bold new ideas and nurture exceptional talent.” This makes Bristol a top choice for students aiming to study in UK and lead in AI innovation.

Industry Connections for Scholars

Beyond funding, the scholarship in UK offers 100 scholars placements at leading AI companies. These placements provide hands-on experience in the fast-paced AI industry. Scholars will also receive mentorship from industry experts, giving them unparalleled access to cutting-edge developments.

This setup ensures students gain practical skills and industry insights, preparing them for high-demand careers in AI.

Boosting the UK’s AI Future

Technology Secretary Peter Kyle MP emphasized the program’s goal: helping students secure “highly skilled jobs” and building “a workforce fit for the future.” The scholarships aim to position the UK as a global AI leader by fostering talent and innovation.

Finn Stevenson, Co-founder and Chief Executive of Flok Health, expressed excitement about the scheme. They said attracting the “world’s best talent” is crucial for advancing AI in the UK.

Promoting Equal Opportunities

AI talent firm Beamery supports the scholarships, aligning with their mission to create “equal access to work” and connect “talent to opportunity.” The program ensures students from diverse backgrounds can access world-class education and career paths in AI.

For those in India, this means a chance to study in UK and join a global industry, even if financial barriers exist. The scholarship removes these hurdles, making it a golden opportunity.

How to Apply

Applications for the Sparck AI Scholarships open in spring 2026. The first group of scholars will begin their studies in autumn 2027. This timeline gives students time to prepare for this life-changing opportunity.

For Indian students, this scholarship in UK is a pathway to join a cutting-edge field. AI, or artificial intelligence, involves creating smart systems that mimic human thinking, like voice assistants or self-driving cars. Studying AI in the UK offers access to advanced technology and global career prospects.

Thousands of Harvard ex-students sign legal document supporting Harvard

A historic coalition of over 12,000 Harvard University graduates, spanning from the class of 1950 to the newly minted class of 2025, has united to support their alma mater in a significant legal battle against the Trump administration’s decision to withhold over $2.2 billion in federal funding. This collective action, reported first by CNN, takes the form of an amicus brief submitted to the court on Monday, marking what is believed to be the largest alumni-driven legal brief from a single institution in history.

The amicus brief, a document provided by a third party to offer courts additional context or perspective, reflects a diverse group of signatories bound by their shared Harvard education and a commitment to safeguarding the university’s future. Among them are notable figures such as comedian Conan O’Brien, author Margaret Atwood, Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey, a Wisconsin beer brewer, an Ohio fighter pilot, and a South Dakota tribal leader, representing a broad cross-section of professions and regions.

Harvard initiated legal action against the Trump administration in April, challenging the freeze on federal funding and requesting an expedited court ruling. Oral arguments are set for July 21. The alumni brief underscores the gravity of the moment, arguing that the outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for academic freedom, institutional autonomy, and federal oversight of higher education across the United States.

The brief states, “As alumni, we are deeply alarmed by the Government’s reckless and unlawful attempts to assert control over the core functions of Harvard and its fellow institutions of higher education. Without due process or any recognizable basis in law—and with complete disregard for the freedoms the Constitution secures and the constraints it imposes—the Government has embarked on a campaign to deploy every power at its disposal to damage Harvard.”

It further asserts, “The Government’s end goal is to narrow our freedoms to learn, teach, think, and act, and to claim for itself the right to dictate who may enjoy those freedoms. As alumni, we attest that Harvard’s true greatness resides in the ways we share these values and exercise these freedoms.”

Anurima Bhargava, a Harvard alumna, documentary filmmaker, and civil rights lawyer who has been instrumental in organizing this effort, emphasized the broader significance of the alumni’s stand. In an interview with CNN, she described the brief as a powerful symbol of unity, transcending political and social divides. “Our education equips us to be defenders of democracy and liberty,” Bhargava said. “This is about protecting the ability of all schools—beyond just Harvard—to foster free thought, learning, and expression without government overreach.”

Bhargava also noted that some alumni hesitated to sign the brief due to concerns about potential retaliation from the administration, highlighting the charged atmosphere surrounding the issue.

The Trump administration’s actions, which predate President Donald Trump’s return to office, are framed by his allies as a response to antisemitism on campus, particularly in the context of the Israel-Hamas conflict. However, the alumni brief contends that the administration’s broader agenda extends beyond this issue and is seen by some in the White House as a politically advantageous move.

The brief declares, “We unequivocally condemn antisemitism and every other form of discrimination and hate, which have no place at Harvard or anywhere else in our society. Yet charges of antisemitism—particularly without due process and proper bases and findings by the Government—should not be used as a pretext for the illegal and unconstitutional punishment and takeover of an academic institution by the Government. Indeed, most of the Government’s demands on Harvard have little or nothing to do with combating antisemitism, or any other kind of bias and discrimination, on campus.”

Harvard is currently entangled in multiple legal disputes with the Trump administration, which has launched several investigations into the university. While Education Secretary Linda McMahon and other White House officials have indicated a willingness to negotiate, no discussions are currently underway. The White House did not respond to requests for comment on the alumni brief.

This unprecedented show of solidarity from Harvard’s alumni underscores the high stakes of the university’s fight, not only for its own future but for the principles of academic freedom and institutional independence across higher education.

Harsh Patel Sentenced to 10 years in Prison.

Human smuggler gets 10-year sentence for his role in the human smuggling operation which caused a family of four to freeze to death on the US-Canada border. 

In January 2022, Jagdish Patel (39), his wife Vaishaliben (37), their daughter Vihangi (11), and son Dharmik (3), all from Dingucha, Gujarat, froze to death while attempting to illegally cross the U.S.-Canada border during a blizzard. The family, lured by promises of a better life, was part of a group of 11 Indian migrants smuggled through a sophisticated operation orchestrated by Harshkumar Ramanlal Patel (no relation to the victims). On January 19, 2022, near the Manitoba-Minnesota border, the group faced brutal conditions with wind chill temperatures dropping to -36°F. The Royal Canadian Mounted Police discovered the family’s bodies just 33 feet from the U.S. border, highlighting the deadly risks of the smuggling operation.

 

Following his imprisonment, Patel faces deportation from the United States. His accomplice, 50-year-old Steve Anthony Shand, also from Florida, was sentenced to six years and six months in prison, followed by two years of supervised release. Trial evidence revealed that Patel and Shand participated in an extensive smuggling network that facilitated the entry of Indian nationals into Canada using fraudulent student visas before illegally transporting them across the U.S. northern border. Patel coordinated the smuggling logistics from Manitoba, Canada, into the U.S., while Shand drove the migrants from just south of the Canadian border to Chicago. Both profited from the operation, ignoring the dangers of extreme cold faced by the migrants. The trial disclosed that the smuggling fee from India through Canada to the U.S. was approximately $100,000 per person.

 

Matthew R. Galeotti, Head of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division said “Patel and Shand endangered thousands of lives for their personal enrichment and are responsible for the deaths of two small children who froze to death on their watch. This case demonstrates the grave danger associated with human smuggling operations. I thank the prosecutors and our law enforcement partners in the U.S. and in Canada who are working to secure the northern border and end the perilous smuggling of aliens into the United States.”

 

The sentencing of Harshkumar Patel and Steve Shand may deter some human smuggling activities by showcasing consequences, but it’s unlikely to stop the practice entirely. Human smuggling is driven by complex factors like economic desperation, global migration pressures, and organized crime networks, which persist despite individual convictions. Their operation charged $100,000 per person, indicating high profitability that attracts others to fill the void. While the 10-year and 6.5-year sentences send a message, the U.S.-Canada border’s vastness and demand for migration routes suggest smuggling will continue unless root causes—poverty, visa restrictions, and lax enforcement—are addressed. Data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection shows over 1,000 apprehensions of Indian nationals at the northern border in 2022, a fraction of total attempts, highlighting the scale of the issue.

 

Estimates of Indian Nationals Smuggled into the U.S. and Canada

Precise numbers of Indian nationals smuggled into the U.S. and Canada are challenging to pinpoint due to the clandestine nature of human smuggling and incomplete data on undetected crossings. However, available data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and other sources provide estimates:

United States: 

In Fiscal Year (FY) 2023, CBP encountered approximately 96,917 Indian nationals attempting illegal crossings at U.S. borders, with 30,010 at the U.S.-Canada border and 41,770 at the U.S.-Mexico border. This marks a significant increase from 2,225 at the northern border in FY 2021. 

Since October 2020, CBP has recorded about 169,000 encounters with Indian migrants at both southern and northern U.S. land borders, making them the largest group of extra-hemispheric migrants encountered during this period.

In FY 2024, 43,764 Indian nationals were detained at the U.S.-Canada border, the highest recorded figure for this entry point, with a total of 69,380 encounters across both borders (25,616 at the southern border).

Estimates suggest around 725,000 undocumented Indian immigrants were living in the U.S. as of 2022, making them the third-largest group of unauthorized immigrants after Mexicans and Salvadorans.

Canada: 

Specific figures for Indian nationals smuggled into Canada are less clear, as Canada’s data focuses more on apprehensions at the U.S. border or asylum claims. However, a 2023 report noted that Indians are among the largest groups of asylum seekers in Canada, with many entering legally on visitor or student visas before attempting to cross into the U.S.

These figures likely underestimate the total number of smuggled individuals, as they only account for those apprehended or encountered by authorities. Many crossings go undetected, and the smuggling networks are sophisticated, often involving multiple countries and routes.

 

See the latest study abroad news and updates