Australia raises students cap for 2025/26. Indicative Allotments for each university now available.

Australia raises students cap for 2025/26. Indicative Allotments for each university now available.

Australia has raised the student cap from 270,000 in 2025/26 to 295,000 for 2025/26. The new National Planning Level sees an increase of almost 10% over the academic year 2024/25.

What were the 2024/25 caps?

In 2025, Australiacapped new international student commencements at 270,000 to manage migration and restore pre-pandemic levels. This included higher education and vocational sectors, with exemptions for certain categories like school students, postgraduate researchers, and specific scholarship holders.

What was the indicative allotment for 2024/25

Public universities are allocated 145,000 new international student spots, roughly matching 2023 levels, while private universities and non-university providers get 30,000, and vocational education (VET) providers receive 95,000. Each university, college and VET was given a ‘quota’ for the number of international students they could enroll.

 

The Priority System

The new priority system replaces Ministerial Direction 107, prioritizing visa processing for students at low-risk institutions. Education providers (higher education and VET) with less than 80% of their 2025 indicative student enrollment allocation filled receive Priority One processing, ensuring faster visa approvals. Once a provider reaches 80% of its cap, subsequent applications shift to Priority Two (standard processing), which is slower.

 

New Indicative allotments for 2025/26

The new indicative allotments for the academic year have now been published. See what the allotment is for popular universities and colleges.

CRICOS Code Provider Name NOSC allocation
01328A ACAP University College 310
01822J ACPE Limited 50
03986F AIE Institute Limited 50
03375M AUSTRALIAN COLLEGE OF CHRISTIAN STUDIES LTD 50
02439G Academies Australasia Polytechnic Pty Limited 105
02155J Academy of Interactive Technology 105
00197D Acknowledge Education Pty Ltd 1565
03763K Adelaide Institute of Higher Education Pty Ltd 55
00958A Alphacrucis University College Limited 75
04059D Analytics Institute of Australia Pty Ltd 50
03967J Apex Institute of Higher Education Pty Ltd 165
03048D Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd 495
04231H Astra Institute of Higher Education 50
04181B Australasian Academy of Higher Education 145
03836J Australia Advance Education Group Pty Ltd 445
01108B Australian Academy of Music and Performing Arts 50
03809A Australian Campus Management Pty Ltd 610
03943F Australian Chiropractic College Limited 50
00231G Australian College of Natural Medicine Pty Ltd 50
03761A Australian College of Nursing Ltd 50
03392K Australian College of the Arts Pty Ltd 50
04102F Australian Data and Cyber Institute 50
03662D Australian Film, Television and Radio School 50
04168K Australian Guild of Education Pty Ltd 50
04191M Australian Institute of Advanced Technologies 55
03844J Australian Institute of Business Intelligence Pty Ltd 165
03171A Australian Institute of Business and Management Pty Ltd 1165
03147A Australian Institute of Higher Education Pty Ltd 555
04095M Australian Institute of Professional Counsellors 50
03996D Australian Institute of Technology and Commerce Pty Ltd 55
03847F Australian School of Accounting Pty Ltd 195
04289A Australian School of Business Pty Ltd 50
02948J Australian University College of Divinity Ltd 55
02650E Australian University of Theology Limited 50
02731D Avondale University 50
04345J BBS Higher Education Pty Ltd 50
00017B Bond University 800
02411J Box Hill Institute 90
02015K Bureau of Meteorology 50
01718J CIC Higher Education Pty Ltd 155
02738G Campion Institute Limited 50
00881F Chisholm Institute 60
01016F Christian Heritage College 50
02042G Colleges of Business and Technology (WA) Pty Ltd 455
03744B Crown Institute of Higher Education Pty Ltd 585
04122B Danford Higher Education Pty Ltd 50
03932J ECA Higher Education Institute Pty Ltd 105
02804C EQUALS International (Aust) Pty Ltd 50
03853H Eastern College Australia Limited 50
01312J Edith Cowan College Pty Ltd 515
04342A Education and Career Hub Pty Ltd 50
00561M Educational Enterprises Australia Pty Ltd 85
03879J Edvantage Institute Australia Pty Ltd 125
03390A Elite Education Institute Pty Ltd 55
03567C Engineering Institute of Technology Pty Ltd 165
02664K Excelsia University College 525
04218E Global Leadership Institute 50
02571D Group Colleges Australia Pty Ltd 410
03845H Higher Education Leadership Institute 50
02639M Holmes Institute Pty Ltd 445
02727M Holmes Institute Pty Ltd 390
02767C Holmes Institute Pty Ltd 175
00012G Holmesglen Institute 145
02914G ICHM Pty Ltd 95
04219D IIBIT AHE Pty Ltd 50
04229B Imperial Engineering Education 50
03407G Institute of Health & Management Pty Ltd 85
01484M International College of Management, Sydney Pty Limited 320
03345F International Institute of Business & Technology (Australia) Pty Ltd (IIBT) 50
04294D Iona Trinity College 50
01259J JMC Pty Limited 95
03720K Jazz Music Institute Pty Ltd 50
02426B Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd 3265
03127E Kaplan Higher Education Pty Ltd 145
00161E Kent Institute Australia Pty Ltd 205
04352K Kingsford Institute of Higher Education Pty Ltd 50
02201G LCI Melbourne Pty Ltd 50
02380M Le Cordon Bleu Australia Pty Limited 85
03732F Leaders Institute Pty Ltd 55
02224A Leo Cussen Institute 50
04097J Lincoln Institute of Higher Education Ltd 65
03578M Lyons Education Group Pty Ltd 75
04336K MEGA Higher Education Pty Ltd 50
04066E Marasi Education Pty Ltd (VSC) 50
00306D Marcus Oldham College 50
01590J Melbourne Institute of Business & Technology Pty Ltd 630
04018B Melbourne Institute of Higher Education Pty Ltd 50
01545C Melbourne Institute of Technology Pty Ltd 705
03245K Melbourne Institute of Technology Pty Ltd 470
00724G Melbourne Polytechnic 345
04320G Monaro Education Pty Limited 50
01857J Monash College Pty Ltd 710
00682B Moore Theological College Council 50
03265F Morling College Limited 50
04082E Mpika Holdings Pty Ltd 55
03233C Nan Tien Institute Limited 50
04009C National Academy of Professional Studies Pty Ltd 165
03197B National Art School 50
03312D Navitas Bundoora Pty Ltd 495
04265J Nova Anglia College Pty Ltd 50
03429B Ozford Institute of Higher Education Pty Ltd 85
04116M PBL Education Pty Ltd 50
03897G Performing Arts Education Pty Ltd 50
00986G Perth Bible College (Inc) 50
00257G Photography Holdings Pty Ltd 50
03535M Polytechnic Institute Australia Pty Ltd 640
03581E Proteus Technologies Pty Ltd 205
01737F Queensland Institute of Business and Technology Pty Ltd 360
04013G Queensland Institute of Higher Education Pty Ltd 75
03441F Russo Business School Pty Ltd 55
00312F SAE Institute Pty Ltd 55
03335G SP Jain School of Global Management Pty Ltd 280
03391M Sheridan College Inc 50
03383M Sicop Education & Technology Pty Ltd 95
04214J Skyline Higher Education Australia 55
02193C South Australian Institute of Business and Technology Pty Ltd 360
04202B Southern Academy of Higher Education Pty Ltd 165
03739K Southern Cross Education Institute (Higher Education) Pty Ltd 390
04078A Southern Cross Institute (SCI) 370
03047E Stanley International College Pty Ltd 340
01576G Sydney Institute of Business and Technology Pty Ltd 85
01768K Sydney Institute of Health Sciences Pty Ltd 50
03866C Sydney Institute of Higher Education Pty Ltd 225
04339G Sydney Institute of Technology Innovation Pty Ltd 50
03906M Sydney Metropolitan Institute of Technology Pty Ltd 245
04090E Sydney Polytechnic Institute 55
03020E TAFE Queensland 65
00092B TAFE SA 75
00591E Technical and Further Education Commission 525
03894K Texila College Australia Pty Ltd 225
00665C The Australian Institute of Music Limited 55
03530E The Cairnmillar Institute 50
03155A The College of Law Limited 50
03705J The Institute of International Studies (TIIS) Pty Ltd 145
00756M The National Institute of Dramatic Art (NIDA) 50
00246M Think: Colleges Pty Ltd 50
02491D Top Education Group Ltd 525
03389E Torrens University Australia Limited 2855
01020K UNSW Global Pty Limited 525
02723D UOWC Ltd 145
00859D UTS College Limited 515
03848E Universal Higher Education Pty Ltd 65
01037A University of Divinity 50
02044E Victorian Institute of Technology Pty Ltd 1125
02863C WHITEHOUSE INSTITUTE PTY LTD 50
03279M Wentworth Institute of Higher Education Pty Ltd 465
03663C Western Sydney University International College Pty Ltd 165
00899G Whitecliffe Institute of Creative Arts and Technology Pty 50
01505M William Angliss Institute of TAFE 90

 

 

 

 

Canada Student Visa Data for 2024 is out! What trends did we see?

Canada Student Visa Data for 2024 is out! What trends did we see?

Canada introduced and brought into effect the student visa caps in January 2024. The caps aimed to reduce the number of new study permits by -35%, relative to 2023. Effectively, given the number of study permits issued in 2023, the target for 2024 was 364,000 study permits.

What did 2024’s Data show?

The full data for study permits in 2024 is now available. It shows the number of new study permits issued in 2024 to be 267,890! This means that Canada has ‘achieved’ more than it intended! The new IRCC figures reveal a decrease of -48%! This means that The Canadian government and IRCC have overshot their targets by far.

What’s behind these numbers! Why have visa issuances dropped so much?

The caps themselves are probably not to blame alone. There’s a whole combination of interrelated factors working here. Let’s see what they are.

  1. Stricter Financial Requirements

Starting January 1, 2024, the cost-of-living requirement for study permit applicants doubled to CA$20,635 from CA$10,000. This increase likely deterred many Indian applicants, who often come from middle-class backgrounds and may struggle to demonstrate such funds. The high financial threshold disproportionately impacted Indian students, reducing applications globally.

  1. Increased Visa Scrutiny and Fraud Detection

IRCC’s enhanced verification measures, including mandatory confirmation of acceptance letters by Designated Learning Institutions (DLIs) since December 2023, aimed to curb fraudulent applications. Indian students, historically targeted by unscrupulous agents promising guaranteed visas, may have faced higher rejection rates as IRCC tightened scrutiny, contributing to the lower permit numbers.

  1. Provincial Allocation and Processing Delays

The cap allocated permits by province, weighted by population, requiring Provincial Attestation Letters (PALs). Provinces like Ontario, with high Indian student populations, faced stricter reductions due to unsustainable growth. Delays in PAL issuance or uneven distribution may have bottlenecked applications, particularly for Indian students concentrated in provinces like Ontario and British Columbia.

  1. Market Perception and Alternatives

The cap, combined with media coverage of Canada’s immigration crackdowns, may have pushed Indian students toward alternatives like Australia, the UK, or the US. Australia’s indicative allocations and new priority levels, while restrictive, includes exemptions for certain programs, and the UK, despite its own reductions, remains competitive. Indian students, aware of Canada’s tightened policies, may have applied elsewhere, reducing demand.

So, is Canada still a good destination for the genuine student?

Canada remains a compelling destination for genuine international students, particularly those with strong academic profiles and clear intentions to study, despite tightened policies. Here’s a breakdown of why it’s still a good choice, with key considerations:

High-Quality Education

Canada’s universities, like the University of Toronto and UBC, consistently rank among the world’s best, offering globally recognized degrees. Programs in STEM, business, and health sciences are particularly strong, ensuring value for serious students.

Post-Graduation Work Opportunities

The Post-Graduation Work Permit (PGWP) allows graduates to work in Canada for up to three years, providing a pathway to gain professional experience. While immigration policies have tightened, genuine students completing eligible programs at Designated Learning Institutions (DLIs) still benefit.

Affordable Compared to Alternatives

Despite the doubled financial requirement (CA$20,635), Canada’s tuition (CA$20,000–CA$40,000 annually for undergraduates) is often lower than in the US or Australia. Scholarships and part-time work (up to 20 hours/week) help offset costs for committed students.

Pathway to Permanent Residency

Programs like the Canadian Experience Class and Provincial Nominee Programs remain accessible for graduates with Canadian work experience. Genuine students who excel academically and professionally have a clear immigration route.

The Final Word

Canada is still a strong choice for genuine students who are well-prepared, financially secure, and focused on academic and career goals, though they must navigate stricter regulations and plan strategically.

 

Australian Student Visa Fees Surge to AUD$2,000, Raising Concerns for International Education

Australian Student Visa Fees Surge to AUD$2,000, Raising Concerns for International Education

As of July 1, 2025, the Australian government has raised the student visa application fee to AUD$2,000, solidifying Australia’s position as the country with the most expensive student visa fees globally. This latest hike follows a significant 125% increase in July 2024, when the fee jumped from AUD$710 to AUD$1,600. The escalation in costs has sparked widespread debate, particularly within the international education sector, about its impact on Australia’s appeal as a study destination and the sustainability of its education industry.

Reasons Behind the Fee Increase

The Australian government has justified the fee hike as a measure to enhance the integrity of the student visa program. According to a spokesperson from the Department of Home Affairs, the increase aligns with the government’s commitment to managing international education sustainably while maintaining its quality, fairness, and credibility. The higher fees are intended to deter non-genuine applicants, ensuring that visas are granted to students who contribute to Australia’s economic growth through education and skilled migration pathways. Additionally, the government aims to offset the administrative costs of processing visa applications and strengthen compliance measures to prevent visa misuse.

Historically, Australia has periodically adjusted its visa fees to reflect economic and policy priorities. For instance, the fee was AUD$575 in 2019, before rising to AUD$620 in 2020 and AUD$710 by 2023. The sharp increases in 2024 and 2025, however, mark a significant shift, reflecting the government’s focus on stricter immigration controls and sustainable growth in the international education sector.

Impact on the International Education Sector

Australia’s international education industry, valued at approximately AUD$40 billion annually, is a cornerstone of the nation’s economy, supporting thousands of jobs and contributing to cultural diversity. However, the visa fee hikes have raised concerns about the country’s competitiveness as a study destination, particularly when compared to countries like Canada, the UK, and the US, where visa fees are significantly lower (e.g., the UK’s student visa fee is around AUD$700 equivalent).

The English Language Intensive Courses for Overseas Students (ELICOS) sector has been hit hardest. Following the 2024 fee increase, ELICOS providers reported a 50% drop in enrolments, as students enrolling in shorter-term English language courses found the high visa costs disproportionate to their study duration. The additional AUD$400 increase in 2025 is expected to exacerbate this trend, potentially deterring prospective students from choosing Australia for short-term or preparatory programs.

Universities, which rely heavily on international students for revenue, are also bracing for potential impacts. While Australia remains a popular destination due to its high-quality education, safe environment, and post-study work opportunities, the rising costs could push price-sensitive students toward more affordable alternatives. Countries like Canada and New Zealand, with lower visa fees and competitive education offerings, may gain an edge. Furthermore, the fee hikes could disproportionately affect students from developing nations, potentially reducing diversity in Australian classrooms.

Exceptions and Government Assurances

The government has maintained reduced visa application charges for primary applicants from Pacific Island nations and Timor-Leste, honoring existing regional agreements. This exemption aims to support educational access for students from these areas, fostering regional goodwill and development.

The Department of Home Affairs emphasizes that the fee increase is part of a broader strategy to ensure the long-term sustainability of the international education sector. By prioritizing “genuine” students, the government hopes to maintain Australia’s reputation as a premier education destination while addressing concerns about visa system abuse.

Potential Outcomes for Universities

The university sector faces a complex outlook. On one hand, the fee increase may filter out less committed applicants, potentially reducing strain on resources and improving the quality of student cohorts. On the other hand, a decline in international student numbers could lead to significant revenue losses for universities, particularly those heavily reliant on international tuition fees. Regional universities and institutions offering specialized or short-term courses may face the greatest challenges, as students may opt for more affordable programs elsewhere.

Moreover, the fee hikes could accelerate the shift toward online and transnational education programs, where students can access Australian qualifications without incurring visa costs. Universities may need to invest in digital infrastructure and innovative delivery models to remain competitive.

The final word

The increase in Australia’s student visa fee to AUD$2,000 marks a bold move to strengthen the integrity of its visa program, but it comes with risks. While the government aims to ensure sustainable growth in the international education sector, the rising costs could deter prospective students, particularly in the ELICOS and short-term course markets. As universities navigate this new reality, they may need to adapt their recruitment strategies and program offerings to maintain Australia’s position as a global education leader. The long-term impact of these changes will depend on how the government balances economic goals with the need to remain an attractive destination for international students.

 

See the latest study abroad news and updates

Study: UK Universities Face Financial Risks from Proposed Immigration Reforms

Study: UK Universities Face Financial Risks from Proposed Immigration Reforms

Background on UK Higher Education and Immigration Policy

The UK’s higher education sector has long been a cornerstone of its global reputation, attracting international students who contribute significantly to both academic institutions and the national economy. However, recent data and policy developments signal potential challenges. According to a March 2025 report, foreign student enrollment in UK universities declined in the 2023/24 academic year, driven partly by stricter immigration policies and global competition (ICEF Monitor, March 2025). This decline follows a period of substantial growth, with international students doubling their share of total enrollment from 12% in 2001/02 to 24% by 2021/22, largely due to surging postgraduate numbers.

In April 2025, a UK commission emphasized the need for a more strategic and sustainable approach to international student recruitment, highlighting the sector’s reliance on foreign tuition fees, which accounted for nearly 20% of university income in 2023/24 (ICEF Monitor, April 2025). The commission warned that without a balanced strategy, universities risk financial instability. Adding to these concerns, the UK government’s immigration white paper, detailed in May 2025, outlined plans to reduce migration across all visa categories, including the Student Route, and shorten the Graduate Route work term from two years to 18 months (ICEF Monitor, May 2025). These reforms could further deter international students, exacerbating financial pressures on universities.

A new analysis from the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change underscores the vulnerability of UK universities, particularly Post-1992 institutions, to these proposed immigration changes. This article explores the potential impacts, focusing on the financial and regional consequences for the higher education sector.

The Rise and Role of Post-1992 Universities

Origins and Characteristics

Post-1992 universities, often called “modern” or “new” universities, emerged from the Further and Higher Education Act 1992, which granted university status to 78 former polytechnics and colleges. These institutions now constitute nearly half of the UK’s higher education system. Designed to expand access to higher education in underserved regions, Post-92 universities emphasize applied programs, aligning their offerings with local labor market needs and prioritizing graduate employability. Their agile structures enable flexible program delivery, attracting a diverse student base, including non-traditional learners. Post-1992 universities popular among international students include Anglia Ruskin University, Coventry University, University of Greenwich, London Met., and Nottingham Trent University.

Economic and Social Contributions

These universities play a vital role in their communities, serving as major employers and economic drivers in often economically deprived areas. By offering accessible degree programs, they enhance regional opportunities and foster social mobility. Their focus on practical, career-oriented education strengthens local workforces, making them integral to regional development.

Financial Vulnerabilities in the Higher Education Sector

Dependence on International Student Fees

The financial health of many UK universities hinges on international student tuition fees, which have grown dramatically from £4.7 billion in 2016/17 to £10 billion in 2023/24. This revenue stream is particularly critical for Post-1992 universities, which rely more heavily on international students compared to top-tier Russell Group institutions, known for generating larger budget surpluses. The Tony Blair Institute projects that 43% of UK universities will face deficits in the 2024/25 academic year, with 72% potentially in deficit by 2025/26, and 40% at risk of having fewer than 30 days’ liquidity.

Impact of Proposed Immigration Reforms

The government’s immigration white paper aims to reduce net migration, including through restrictions on the Student Route. These changes are expected to decrease international student numbers, directly threatening university budgets. Post-1992 universities, with their greater dependence on foreign tuition fees, face heightened risks. A sudden drop in enrollment could jeopardize their financial stability, potentially leading to reduced course offerings, staff layoffs, or even institutional closures.

Balancing Immigration Goals with Higher Education Needs

Policy Trade-Offs

The Tony Blair Institute highlights the tension between the government’s dual objectives: curbing immigration and supporting economic growth through higher education. While reducing migration aligns with current policy priorities, it risks undermining the economic and social contributions of universities, particularly in less affluent regions. The report urges policymakers to consider these trade-offs carefully, advocating for measures to mitigate the financial impact on vulnerable institutions.

Recommendations for Sustainability

To address these challenges, the report suggests a balanced approach to immigration reform that preserves the international appeal of UK universities. This could include targeted exemptions for high-demand programs or regions heavily reliant on university-driven economic activity. Additionally, diversifying revenue streams and reducing dependence on international fees could bolster the sector’s resilience, ensuring that Post-1992 universities continue to serve their communities effectively.

The final Word

The UK’s higher education sector stands at a crossroads as proposed immigration reforms threaten to disrupt a critical revenue source. Post-1992 universities, with their significant regional impact and reliance on international student fees, are particularly exposed. As the government navigates its immigration agenda, it must weigh the economic and social value of these institutions to avoid unintended consequences that could undermine access to education and regional prosperity.

 

US State Department: “Resume Student Visas but vet students with ‘hostile attitudes’”

US State Department: “Resume Student Visas but vet students with ‘hostile attitudes’”

The United States Department of State has said that it will resume student visa applications but has asked all applicants to make their social media accounts public. Instructions to officials include identifying “any indications of hostility toward the citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles of the United States”. These guidelines apply to all F, M and J visa applicants and applicants to these categories will be impacted. 

In addition, any applicant who keeps their social media private will be adjudged to have been trying to hide their social media activity- a likely cause for rejection of visa applications in the future. 

It is an expectation from American citizens that their government will make every effort to make our country safer, and that is exactly what the Trump Administration is doing every single day,” a senior State Department official added.

Visa officers have been instructed to look for applicants “who advocate for, aid, or support designated foreign terrorists and other threats to national security; or who perpetrate unlawful anti-Semitic harassment or violence“. 

Instructions sent to Diplomatic posts worldwide

A cable obtained by CNN on Wednesday reveals that new instructions were dispatched to U.S. diplomatic posts globally. The guidance mandates that the vetting process for student and exchange visa applicants will now examine their “entire online presence.” As part of this updated procedure, applicants must make their social media profiles public. The cable also indicates that “limited access to, or visibility of, online presence could be construed as an effort to evade or hide certain activity.” Embassies and consulates worldwide have been given a deadline of 5 days to implement the new guidelines. 

 

How easy will the new guidelines be to implement? 

Implementing the new U.S. guidelines for screening F, M, and J visa applicants’ social media will be challenging. The vague criteria for “hostility” lack clear definitions, risking inconsistent interpretations by consular officers. Reviewing entire online presences, including taking screenshots, will strain resources, increase workloads, and likely cause delays. The requirement to set profiles to public may also raise privacy concerns, complicating compliance.

 

How will this impact new applicants?

The new U.S. guidelines will significantly impact applicants worldwide. The vague criteria may lead to inconsistent rejections, causing confusion and delays. Applicants must set profiles to public, raising privacy concerns and potentially exposing them to scrutiny over old or misinterpreted posts. The resource-intensive process could overwhelm consulates, slowing visa approvals and disrupting academic plans, especially for students targeting U.S. universities.

 

What is the future going to be like for the US as a destination for international students?

Interest in studying in the U.S. has been declining, particularly among international students, as evidenced by multiple sources:

SEVIS Data Decline:

Between March 2024 and March 2025, international student enrolment in the U.S. dropped by 11.33%, with a significant 28% reduction in Indian students, a key demographic. This decline, noted in SEVIS data, reflects a $4 billion revenue loss for U.S. higher education. 

Studyportals Data:

Student interest in U.S. programs fell to its lowest level since the COVID-19 pandemic, with a 50% drop in weekly pageviews for U.S. degrees between January and April 2025. Students are increasingly exploring alternatives in the UK, Australia, and other countries.

Keystone Education Group Survey:

A 2024 survey showed a 42% drop in international student interest in U.S. Master’s and PhD programs post-Trump’s re-election, citing stricter immigration policies and safety concerns. 

Common App Data:

International student applications to U.S. colleges declined by 1% in 2025, marking the first time since 2019 that domestic applicant growth outpaced international growth.

Are the days of the USA as #1 destination for international students numbered? 

With the UK, France, Ireland and Germany seeing a surge in the number of student visa applications, it does seem that the USA is seeing its grip on the first spot in international education loosen. The attacks on Columbia and Harvard, along with the rhetoric directed at international students who participated in anti-war protests has resulted in thousands of students either putting the decision to study in the US on hold or abandoning plans to study in the US altogether. Although new developments in Iran have put the attacks on higher education in the shadows, the USA is in very real danger of losing the top spot in international enrolments. 

New Scholarship in UK to Shape Future AI Leaders

New Scholarship in UK to Shape Future AI Leaders

A groundbreaking scholarship in UK, launching in spring 2026, aims to nurture the next wave of artificial intelligence (AI) innovators. Named the Sparck AI Scholarships, this initiative honours Karen Sparck Jones, a trailblazing British computer scientist. It offers master’s degree students a chance to study in UK and work with top AI companies.

What Are the Sparck AI Scholarships?

The Sparck AI Scholarships are a fully-funded program by the UK government. They cover tuition fees and living expenses for master’s students, making it easier to study in UK without financial stress. The program is part of the government’s ‘AI Opportunities Action Plan,‘ backed by over £17 million in funding from Westminster.

This scholarship in UK targets students passionate about AI. It will be offered at nine leading universities, including Bristol, Newcastle, Manchester, and Edinburgh.

Why the University of Bristol Stands Out

The University of Bristol is thrilled to join this initiative. “We relish the opportunity,” the university stated, excited to support students in exploring AI’s potential. In 2024, Bristol earned the title of ‘AI University of the Year‘ and developed Isambard-AI, the UK’s most powerful supercomputer for AI research.

Bristol’s Vice-Chancellor, Evelyn Welch, said the scholarships would allow the university to “explore bold new ideas and nurture exceptional talent.” This makes Bristol a top choice for students aiming to study in UK and lead in AI innovation.

Industry Connections for Scholars

Beyond funding, the scholarship in UK offers 100 scholars placements at leading AI companies. These placements provide hands-on experience in the fast-paced AI industry. Scholars will also receive mentorship from industry experts, giving them unparalleled access to cutting-edge developments.

This setup ensures students gain practical skills and industry insights, preparing them for high-demand careers in AI.

Boosting the UK’s AI Future

Technology Secretary Peter Kyle MP emphasized the program’s goal: helping students secure “highly skilled jobs” and building “a workforce fit for the future.” The scholarships aim to position the UK as a global AI leader by fostering talent and innovation.

Finn Stevenson, Co-founder and Chief Executive of Flok Health, expressed excitement about the scheme. They said attracting the “world’s best talent” is crucial for advancing AI in the UK.

Promoting Equal Opportunities

AI talent firm Beamery supports the scholarships, aligning with their mission to create “equal access to work” and connect “talent to opportunity.” The program ensures students from diverse backgrounds can access world-class education and career paths in AI.

For those in India, this means a chance to study in UK and join a global industry, even if financial barriers exist. The scholarship removes these hurdles, making it a golden opportunity.

How to Apply

Applications for the Sparck AI Scholarships open in spring 2026. The first group of scholars will begin their studies in autumn 2027. This timeline gives students time to prepare for this life-changing opportunity.

For Indian students, this scholarship in UK is a pathway to join a cutting-edge field. AI, or artificial intelligence, involves creating smart systems that mimic human thinking, like voice assistants or self-driving cars. Studying AI in the UK offers access to advanced technology and global career prospects.

Thousands of Harvard ex-students sign legal document supporting Harvard

Thousands of Harvard ex-students sign legal document supporting Harvard

A historic coalition of over 12,000 Harvard University graduates, spanning from the class of 1950 to the newly minted class of 2025, has united to support their alma mater in a significant legal battle against the Trump administration’s decision to withhold over $2.2 billion in federal funding. This collective action, reported first by CNN, takes the form of an amicus brief submitted to the court on Monday, marking what is believed to be the largest alumni-driven legal brief from a single institution in history.

The amicus brief, a document provided by a third party to offer courts additional context or perspective, reflects a diverse group of signatories bound by their shared Harvard education and a commitment to safeguarding the university’s future. Among them are notable figures such as comedian Conan O’Brien, author Margaret Atwood, Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey, a Wisconsin beer brewer, an Ohio fighter pilot, and a South Dakota tribal leader, representing a broad cross-section of professions and regions.

Harvard initiated legal action against the Trump administration in April, challenging the freeze on federal funding and requesting an expedited court ruling. Oral arguments are set for July 21. The alumni brief underscores the gravity of the moment, arguing that the outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for academic freedom, institutional autonomy, and federal oversight of higher education across the United States.

The brief states, “As alumni, we are deeply alarmed by the Government’s reckless and unlawful attempts to assert control over the core functions of Harvard and its fellow institutions of higher education. Without due process or any recognizable basis in law—and with complete disregard for the freedoms the Constitution secures and the constraints it imposes—the Government has embarked on a campaign to deploy every power at its disposal to damage Harvard.

It further asserts, “The Government’s end goal is to narrow our freedoms to learn, teach, think, and act, and to claim for itself the right to dictate who may enjoy those freedoms. As alumni, we attest that Harvard’s true greatness resides in the ways we share these values and exercise these freedoms.

Anurima Bhargava, a Harvard alumna, documentary filmmaker, and civil rights lawyer who has been instrumental in organizing this effort, emphasized the broader significance of the alumni’s stand. In an interview with CNN, she described the brief as a powerful symbol of unity, transcending political and social divides. “Our education equips us to be defenders of democracy and liberty,Bhargava said.This is about protecting the ability of all schools—beyond just Harvard—to foster free thought, learning, and expression without government overreach.

Bhargava also noted that some alumni hesitated to sign the brief due to concerns about potential retaliation from the administration, highlighting the charged atmosphere surrounding the issue.

The Trump administration’s actions, which predate President Donald Trump’s return to office, are framed by his allies as a response to antisemitism on campus, particularly in the context of the Israel-Hamas conflict. However, the alumni brief contends that the administration’s broader agenda extends beyond this issue and is seen by some in the White House as a politically advantageous move.

The brief declares, “We unequivocally condemn antisemitism and every other form of discrimination and hate, which have no place at Harvard or anywhere else in our society. Yet charges of antisemitism—particularly without due process and proper bases and findings by the Government—should not be used as a pretext for the illegal and unconstitutional punishment and takeover of an academic institution by the Government. Indeed, most of the Government’s demands on Harvard have little or nothing to do with combating antisemitism, or any other kind of bias and discrimination, on campus.

Harvard is currently entangled in multiple legal disputes with the Trump administration, which has launched several investigations into the university. While Education Secretary Linda McMahon and other White House officials have indicated a willingness to negotiate, no discussions are currently underway. The White House did not respond to requests for comment on the alumni brief.

This unprecedented show of solidarity from Harvard’s alumni underscores the high stakes of the university’s fight, not only for its own future but for the principles of academic freedom and institutional independence across higher education.

Trump Escalates Attack on Harvard’s International Students: proclamation suspends visas for new int’l students

Trump Escalates Attack on Harvard’s International Students: proclamation suspends visas for new int’l students 

Latest Attack and Previous Moves

On Wednesday 4th June, President Donald Trump signed a proclamation suspending international visas for new students at Harvard University, marking a significant escalation in the administration’s ongoing conflict with the Ivy League institution. The order temporarily blocks nearly all new Harvard students from entering the United States under F, M, and J visas, which are commonly used by international students for academic study and exchange programs. Additionally, the proclamation directs the Secretary of State to consider revoking these visas for current Harvard students meeting specific criteria, casting uncertainty over the futures of thousands of international students, who comprise about 27% of Harvard’s student body (6,793 students in the 2024-2025 academic year).

This move follows a series of aggressive actions against Harvard. In March, the Trump administration initiated a review of Harvard’s roughly $9 billion in federal contracts and grants. Subsequently, the White House froze $2.2 billion in federal funding and later cut an additional $450 million in grants, citing Harvard’s refusal to comply with demands to alter campus policies, including those related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and addressing antisemitism. Last month, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem attempted to revoke Harvard’s certification under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP), which would have barred the university from enrolling foreign students. This action was blocked by US District Court Judge Allison Burroughs, who issued a temporary injunction and later a longer-term hold to protect Harvard’s international students while legal proceedings continue. The administration also recently canceled $100 million in remaining federal contracts with Harvard and has threatened to revoke the university’s tax-exempt status.

Trump Administration’s Justification

The White House justifies the visa suspension as a measure to “safeguard national security,” accusing Harvard of having “concerning foreign ties and radicalism.” The proclamation claims the university failed to provide sufficient information about foreign students’ disciplinary records, reporting “deficient data on only three students.” It further alleges that Harvard is either not fully reporting or not adequately policing its foreign students. The administration also criticizes Harvard for failing to address antisemitism on campus and for prioritizing DEI initiatives, which it labels as “racist.” The proclamation asserts that “Harvard’s conduct has rendered it an unsuitable destination for foreign students and researchers.” The order, set to last six months unless extended, exempts students whose entry is deemed in the national interest and does not apply to those attending other US universities through the SEVP program.

Harvard’s Reaction

Harvard has vehemently opposed the proclamation, calling it an illegal and retaliatory attack on its academic community. A university spokesperson stated, “This is yet another illegal retaliatory step taken by the Administration in violation of Harvard’s First Amendment rights.” The university emphasized its commitment to protecting its international students, with the spokesperson adding, “We will continue to protect our international students.” Last month, following the administration’s attempt to ban Harvard from enrolling foreign students, university spokesperson Jason Newton warned, “This retaliatory action threatens serious harm to the Harvard community and our country, and undermines Harvard’s academic and research mission.” Harvard argues that the administration’s actions are a direct response to the university’s refusal to comply with ideologically driven policy demands, particularly around campus programming, admissions, and hiring practices.

Legal Challenges Ahead

Harvard is poised to mount a robust legal defense against the proclamation. The university has already demonstrated success in challenging the administration’s actions, as evidenced by Judge Burroughs’ recent rulings blocking the SEVP certification revocation. Harvard is likely to argue that the proclamation violates its First Amendment rights, as it did in response to earlier actions, asserting that the administration’s demands infringe on academic freedom and institutional autonomy. The university could also contend that the proclamation fails to adhere to proper administrative procedures, similar to its argument that the SEVP revocation did not follow established requirements. Harvard may seek an injunction to halt the visa suspension, citing irreparable harm to its international students and academic mission. Additionally, the university could challenge the proclamation’s vague criteria for visa revocations and its selective targeting of Harvard, arguing that it constitutes discriminatory and arbitrary enforcement. Given the significant financial contributions of international students—who often pay full tuition without federal aid—Harvard may also highlight the broader economic and academic impact on American higher education.

The ongoing legal battle underscores a broader conflict between the Trump administration and elite universities, with Harvard at the forefront. As the university navigates these challenges, the outcome will likely have far-reaching implications for international education and academic freedom in the United States.

Canada Strong Borders Act: New bill makes it tougher for international students to get asylum.

Canada Strong Borders Act: New bill makes it tougher for international students to get asylum.

Canada has introduced the Strong Borders Act, a comprehensive legislative proposal designed to bolster border security, curb illegal fentanyl trafficking, tackle money laundering, and reinforce the integrity of its immigration framework. A key focus of the bill is addressing the growing trend of international students filing asylum claims, which has strained Canada’s immigration system. In 2024, asylum claims by international students reached a record 20,245, with projections indicating further increases in 2025. Notably, between January and September 2024, approximately 14,000 claims were filed, with Indian nationals contributing around 2,300 of these applications.

The legislation introduces stringent measures to prevent misuse of the asylum process. It stipulates that asylum claims filed more than one year after arriving in Canada (post-June 24, 2020) will not be referred to the Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB). Additionally, claims made more than 14 days after illegally crossing the Canada-US land border will be deemed ineligible. The bill also mandates that asylum decisions be made while claimants are in Canada, inactive cases be dismissed, and voluntary departures be accelerated. To protect vulnerable individuals, such as minors, the legislation ensures that representatives are appointed to assist them during proceedings.

Reasons Behind the Surge in Asylum Claims

The increase in asylum claims by international students is largely driven by tightened immigration policies. Recent changes include a significant reduction in study permits, stricter work permit eligibility, and limited pathways to permanent residency. These restrictions have led some students, particularly from countries like India, Nigeria, Guinea, Ghana, and the Democratic Republic of Congo, to pursue asylum as an alternative to remain in Canada. However, many students are misled into believing that asylum claims can easily convert their temporary status into permanent residency. In reality, fraudulent claims often lead to deportation, undermining the asylum system’s integrity.

The IRB currently faces a backlog of approximately 275,000 cases, with an annual processing capacity of only 80,000 claims, resulting in delays of about 3.5 years. This backlog exacerbates the issue, as prolonged wait times encourage students to file asylum claims in hopes of extending their stay in Canada.

Government’s Rationale and Measures

The Canadian government, through the Strong Borders Act, aims to safeguard the asylum system and enhance national security. The legislation empowers Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) to share immigration-related information, such as status and documentation, with federal, provincial, and territorial authorities under formal agreements. Additionally, the IRCC gains authority to cancel, suspend, or modify immigration documents, pause the acceptance of new applications, or halt the processing of existing ones for reasons related to public health or national security. These measures are intended to create a more flexible and resilient immigration system capable of responding to emerging challenges.

Immigration Minister Lena Metlege Diab emphasized the government’s objectives, stating, “Canada is taking decisive steps to address growing migration pressures. We are strengthening security at our borders and ensuring our immigration and asylum systems are robust, adaptable, and fair. This legislation protects the integrity of our processes while building a safer, more secure Canada.”

Implications and Protections

The Strong Borders Act seeks to deter false asylum claims while maintaining protections for genuine refugees. By limiting eligibility for claims filed under specific conditions, the government aims to reduce the IRB’s backlog and streamline processing. However, the bill ensures that vulnerable claimants, such as unaccompanied minors, receive support through appointed representatives, balancing enforcement with compassion.

The legislation responds to the complex challenges posed by rising asylum claims and evolving migration patterns. By addressing systemic vulnerabilities and enhancing coordination between authorities, Canada aims to maintain a fair and efficient immigration system while upholding its commitment to border security and public safety.

1 2 3 7